2026 (5) TMI 1234
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Vaibhav Dubey, Advs. For the Respondent Through: Mr. Rahul Tyagi, SC for ED with Ms. Priya Rai, Mr. Jatin, ASPP & Mr. Amit Rohil, Advs. NAVIN CHAWLA, J. (ORAL) 1. This appeal has been filed under Section 42 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 ("PMLA"), challenging the order dated 02.12.2025 passed by the learned Appellate Tribunal under SAFEMA in MP-PMLA-1715/DLI/2025 (Direct....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... directed to be released by the respondent to the appellant. The impugned order has been passed on the said application. 4. The learned Tribunal has disallowed the above prayer of the appellant, only on the ground that the respondent has also challenged the order dated 11.03.2025 passed by the learned Adjudicating Authority by way of a separate appeal before the learned Tribunal, and that grant....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ation filed by the respondent. Such is not the case here. 7. Whether the appeal filed by the respondent challenging the reduction in the quantification of proceeds of crime by the Adjudicating Authority was prima facie meritorious or not has to be determined in the appeal filed by the respondent qua the reduced amount. 8. In the impugned order, we do not find any consideration of the prima f....
TaxTMI