2026 (5) TMI 1154
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....nd Ms. Sukriti Kaur, Advocate. For the Respondent: Mr. Rajesh Sethi, Senior Standing Counsel with Mr. Anshuman Sethi, Advocate. ORDER This application has been moved by the applicant for modification of order dated 15.12.2025, whereby the benefit of bail was accorded to the petitioner. The abovementioned application has been filed in the backdrop of the following facts:- "For the....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e Court concerned and shall notify the change in address to the trial Court, till the conclusion of trial; c) that the petitioner shall submit a security bond equal to the amount being claimed by the complainant as tax & penalty. If the petitioner is found guilty at the conclusion of trial, the complainant would be entitled to use the above mentioned security bond for the realization of t....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ate of Gujarat' 2023 SCC OnLine SC 1170 and 'Yashik Jindal V/s Union of India' 2023 SCC OnLine SC 417, it has been contended by learned counsel for the applicant that the abovementioned condition is not in conformity with laid down law and that the same is creating hardship for the applicant. In view of above the request for modification of order, i.e. for withdrawal of condition in para No.45(c) ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ds, which means that the applicant is neither supposed to deposit the money in advance before being released on bail, nor is he supposed to furnish the bank guarantee. The abovementioned condition is altogether different from the conditions, imposed in the cases of 'Subhash Chouhan', 'Anatbhai Ashokbhai Shah', 'Makhijani Pushpak Harish' and 'Yashik Jindal' (supra). Thus, it is hereby observed that....
TaxTMI