Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2002 (12) TMI 189

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ber (J)]. - Heard both sides. 2. Keeping in view of the facts and circumstances of the case the pre-deposit of duty and penalty is waived for hearing of the appeal. 3. With the consent of both the parties, the appeal is being taken up for hearing. 4. In this case a show cause notice is issued to the appellant for denying the benefit of Modvat credit on Humidification Plant as capital good....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....he case of C.C.E., Coimbatore v. Shanmugaraja Spinning Mills (P) Ltd., reported in 1997 (89) E.L.T. 84. This view was not approved by the Larger Bench of the Tribunal in the case of Jawahar Mills Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise, Coimbatore, reported in 1999 (108) E.L.T. 47 (Tri.). The Larger Bench of the Tribunal in Para 31, specifically held that the view taken by the Bench in the case of ....