Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

Ad hoc disallowance and bogus purchase additions deleted or restricted where records, banking payments, and sales were supported.

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Ad hoc disallowance of business expenditure was deleted because the assessee had produced books of account, bills, vouchers, stock register, purchase details, bank statements and expense vouchers, and the books were not rejected under section 145(3). In respect of purchases from one supplier, the estimated profit addition was deleted in full because payments were through banking channels, supporting records were filed, notices were replied to by the supplier confirming the transactions, and there was no evidence of cash return or doubt about corresponding sales. For another supplier, only the embedded profit in the disputed purchases was brought to tax as grey market purchases, and the addition was restricted to 2 per cent.....