2002 (10) TMI 175

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nce upheld. (ii)     Since the said bulk drug (the final product) was chargeable to "nil" rate of duty on being classified under Sub-Heading 3003.20 Modvat credit on the inputs utilised for the manufacture of the said bulk drug was not admissible and the Assistant Commissioner's finding in this respect is upheld. (iii)    As regards reversal of Modvat credit already availed by the appellant, the matter remanded to the Assistant Commissioner for re-examination in the light of this Hon'ble Tribunal's earlier order setting aside the demand on the ground of the demand being barred by limitation, since the said order of the Tribunal covered a common period as involved in the impugned order of the Assistan....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....should not be denied since bulk drugs were chargeable to 'nil' rate of duty during the period 16-3-95 to 20-2-98. The Asstt. Collector confirmed this notice which was upheld by the Commissioner (Appeals) and hence the present appeal. 4. We have considered the submissions made by both the sides and the material on record and find - (a)     The said product is a specified bulk drug in terms of drugs licence issued by the Drug Control, Govt. of West Bengal and is covered by the Drugs Price 'Control' Orders and specified in the Pharmacopoeia. It is undisputedly a drug under the category "other bulk drugs". Therefore, by Chapter 2(I)(b) of Chapter 30 of Central Excise Tariff it would be covered under the definition of m....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... list effective 16-3-95 to 30-4-95 allegedly pending approval before the Asstt. Collector cannot give him the right to issue and determine the eligibility of Modvat credit claimed. Denial of Modvat credit and its recovery by a notice could be effected and made under rule 57-I. A perusal of the notice dt. 30-12-98 issued, indicates and reads as follows :- ".......Whereas it further appears that the assessee has declared in the corresponding classification lists Declaration referred to above that they would be availing Modvat Credit of Central Excise duty paid on inputs to be utilised for manufacture of Quiniotochlor I.P. in contravention of Rule 57G of Central Excise Rules, 1944 in much as Quiniotochlor I.P. being rightly classifiable und....