2026 (5) TMI 708
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Mr. Goverdhan Lal Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Sushant Keprate, Additional Advocate General, for respondents No. 1 & 3. For the Respondent No.2-UOI: Mr. Bharat Bhushan, Senior Panel Counsel,. ORDER PER VIVEK SINGH THAKUR, JUDGE Petitioner has approached this Court seeking following main substantial relief(s):- "i. For is....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....gh Court and in CWP No. 4706 of 2024 in the case of JHS Svendgaard Laboratories Limited vs. State of H.P. & others of Hon'ble Himachal Pradesh High Court. ii. For issuance of a writ of Certiorari or a writ in the nature of Certiorari or any other appropriate writ or direction calling for the records pertaining to the Petitioners' case and after going into the validity and legality the....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ioner contained in the reply as well as documents filed therewith has not been considered. 5. It has been further submitted that the petitioner would be satisfied, if the concerned authorities are directed to consider the claim/objections afresh along with documents filed/to be filed by or on behalf of the petitioner before the competent authority in response to the aforesaid summary show cause....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ioner be granted the benefit of Input Tax Credit in question. 7. Learned Advocate General submits that, in case, the petitioner files a fresh response to the summary show cause notice before the competent authority along with relevant documents to substantiate the claim of petitioner, the competent authority shall decide the same within a reasonable time. 8. In view of above, order DRC-07 da....
TaxTMI