2026 (5) TMI 142
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....APPLICATION NO. 80 OF 2025 - -<br>Customs<br>MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J. For the Applicant - DRI: Ms. Nitee Punde a/w Harshad Shingnapurkar & Krupa Hasurkar,. For the Respondent No. 1: Ms. Deepali Bagla a/w Shreya Shipurkar i/b AH Legal, in APPLN/78/2025 & APPLN/79/2025. For the Respondent No. 1: Dr. Sujay Kantawala a/w Aishwarya Kantawala a/w Jeffry Caleb i/b Avinash Limbola & Ayushi Jha, in AP....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....tional Sessions Judge and, therefore, the impugned Orders passed are perverse. She further submits that the material on record clearly shows the involvement of the Respondent No. 1 - Swapnil Nandakishore Salunkhe and Respondent No. 1 - Vikas Raghunath Padekar in a very serious crime and custodial interrogation is necessary. She submits that the factors which are required to be taken into considera....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... settled legal position at the time of exercising jurisdiction of granting bail are not taken into consideration. The Supreme Court has laid down the parameters to be taken into consideration while grant of bail in the following Judgments: i. Prasanta Kumar Sarkar v. Ashis Chatterjee (2010) 14 SCC 496, (Paragraph No. 9) ii. State Rep. by the C.B.I. v. Anil Sharma (1997) 7 SCC 187....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....il Application No. 813 of 2023 be remanded back to the learned Additional Sessions Judge. Ms. Bagla, learned Counsel and Mr. Kantawala, learned Counsel, however, state that till the disposal of Bail Application No.840 of 2023, Bail Application No.839 of 2023 and Bail Application No. 813 of 2023, the Respondent No. 1 be protected. 6. Thus, in the facts and circumstances and in view of the above ....
TaxTMI
TaxTMI