Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2002 (8) TMI 180

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rawal, Member (T)]. - The issue involved in this appeal filed by M/s. Aditya Steel Industries Limited is whether the capacity of the Stand-By Mill has to be taken into consideration while determining the Annual Capacity of Production. 2. Though the matter is listed only for hearing the Stay Petition, we take up the appeal itself for disposal, after granting the stay of the recovery. 3. Shri ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....the basis of facts of each case, whether the induction furnace unit has one transformer and one electrical panel or otherwise. He, further, submitted that the Board vide Circular No. 326/42/97-CX, dated 25-7-97 has mentioned that the scheme for re-rolling mills, in general terms, is on the same lines as that for the induction furnace units and, therefore, the explanation on some of the common feat....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....eply submitted that the two circulars were issued on 25-7-97 and the common features were noticed by the Board in respect of the re-rolling mills and induction furnace mills and the clarification issued in respect of induction furnace unit was made applicable to the re-rolling mills. They also mentioned that the Circulars were brought to the notice of the Commissioner in their written submission s....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... in para 4.1 that the appellants had claimed that there was only one power supply in their plant with one transformer and the transformer capacity and the load contact did not permit technically both the units to run simultaneously. This averment of the appellants has not been controverted by the adjudicating authority in the impugned order, nor any material has been brought before us to controver....