2023 (6) TMI 1534

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....e Respondent no. 2: Ms. Shilpa Kapil a/w. Mr. Chidanand Kapil. For the Respondent nos. 3 and 4: Ms. Sakshi Bishnoi i/by Mr. S. Yadav. P.C. : 1. Heard. 2. The contention is that the order passed by this Court accepting the statement made on behalf of respondent nos. 2 and 3 to release an amount of Rs. 7.50 lakh within a period of two weeks is based upon an erroneous assumption that the ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....contentions of respondent nos. 2 and 3 in respect of their claims towards demurrage charges for the consignments kept in the custody of respondent nos. 2 and 3. However, when it came to passing of the final order, which is order under review, this Court appears to have ignored it, which fact is elaborated further in the ensuing paragraph. 5. When we go through the order sought to be reviewed, w....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ks from the date of the order, was accepted as it is by this Court. 6. That is the reason, why this Court has noted in paragraph No. 2 that the statement made on behalf of respondent nos. 2 and 3 is accepted as an undertaking given to the Court and then, the Court has proceeded to direct that in the event the amount is not paid within a period of two weeks, the amount would carry interest @ 6% ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....pear to be so. Then, the petitioner also had another opportunity of placing their opposition to the offer of the respondent nos. 2 and 3, which came their way when the payment of amount of Rs. 7.50 lakhs was sought to be made to them by Demand Draft. However, the petitioners by their communication dated 24th May 2018 informed the respondent nos. 2 and 3 that the petitioners refused to accept the D....