Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2002 (1) TMI 201

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Order dated 6-9-2001 has allowed refund of Rs. 6,80,557/- to the appellants with the condition that this amount may be given credit in their relevant CENVAT records. The operative part of the order is reproduced below : "I, thus find that the appellants, were eligible for refund of Rs. 6,80,557/-. Since on both the occasions the amount of duty was paid by debit entries in RG 23A Part-II, I dire....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....cash. In this the reliance is placed on the decision of the Tribunal in the case of CCE, Rajkot v. M/s. Deepak Vegetable Oil Industries [2001 (127) E.L.T. 817 (T) = 2000 (41) RLT 739 (CEGAT)]. I have considered these submissions. It is observed that the appellants at no stage either before the original authority or before the lower appellate authority had ever contended that their case is for paym....