Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2002 (2) TMI 183

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....of Rs. 2,00,000/- each was imposed on them under Section 173Q of the Central Excises & Salt Act, 1944. Aggrieved by the above order Appeal Nos. E/349/93-B and E/68/93-B are filed by M/s. Punjab Project & Construction Co. Ltd. and M/s. NALCO respectively. 2. In the year 1985 the above mentioned parties had entered into a contract for fabrication and erection of Pot Shells by M/s. Punjab Project & Construction Co. Ltd. at the premises of M/s. NALCO. The work was completed in 1986. Show cause notice was then issued on 18-5-92 proposing to levy duty on the manufacture of Pot Shells. While confirming the demand the Collector took the view that Pot Shell is distinct from the raw materials used in the manufacture of the same, has distinct....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....944 and why penalty should not be imposed on them for the alleged contraventions. 5. Before the adjudicating authority the appellant contended that Pot Shells fabricated by them are not excisable goods. It is submitted that there is total non-consideration of this important aspect in the impugned order. We find merit in the contention raised by the appellant. There is no proper consideration of the issue whether Pot Shells fabricated by the appellant are excisable goods, whether it is movable or immovable property etc. The learned Counsel for the appellant M/s. Punjab Project & Construction Co. Ltd. brought to our notice the instructions dated 15-1-2002 issued by the Central Board of Excise & Customs in exercise of its power under ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ule of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 as amounting to manufacture and the word 'manufacturer' shall be construed accordingly and shall include not only a person who employs hired labour in the production or manufacture on his own account, but also any person who engages in their production or manufacture on his own account." According to the Collector it was M/s. Punjab Project & Construction Co. Ltd. who brought into existence by its own skill and labour a separate excisable commodity, namely, Pot Shells as per requirements of M/s. NALCO. Therefore, M/s. Punjab Project & Construction Co. Ltd. is the actual manufacturer of the excisable goods. Then he proceeds to observe that since the goods are manufactured by M/s. Punjab Project & Con....