Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2026 (4) TMI 533

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... / Order / Decisions)<br>Dated:- 5-12-2025<br>IA No. 1535/2025 In Restoration App No. 19/2025 In Restoration App No. 902015/2025 In Company Appeal (AT) (CH) (Ins) No. 35/2021 (IA No. 82/2021 & IA No. 831/2025) - -<br>Insolvency & Bankruptcy<br>JUSTICE SHARAD KUMAR SHARMA MEMBER (JUDICIAL) AND JATINDRANATH SWAIN MEMBER (TECHNICAL) For the Appellant : Mr. Arun Shabari, Advocate For the Respond....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....re not rectified. Hence, under Rule 26 (3) & (4) of the NCLAT Rules, the company appeal was dismissed on 27.02.2025. Seeking the recall of the order dated 27.02.2025, the Appellant had filed an application, being Restoration Application No. 19/2025. The said application was listed for orders on 25.06.2025. However, as none appeared for the Appellant on the said date, Restoration Application No. 19....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ion of number of days of delay that has chanced to maintain the company appeal, we proceed to consider the company appeal on the aspect of limitation. The following dates would be relevant: - (i) The impugned order that was passed by the Ld. Tribunal is dated 21.02.2020 (ii) It is contended by the Appellant that, the said order was not uploaded. Hence, he filed MA No.101/2020 in ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... circumstances, we are unable to understand how the Applicant present in MA/101/2020, being common in MA/68/2020 has not received the order copy." 6. From the aforesaid observation it seems that, the Appellant was trying to make out concocted ground of non-receipt of the certified copy of the order because when one of the parties to the proceedings (i.e., the IRP) has already received the order....