Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2026 (4) TMI 232

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....(4) TMI 232 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CHENNAI - TMI<br>NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CHENNAI - AT<br>Dated:- 10-3-2026<br>Company Appeal (AT) (CH) No. 32/2026 (IA No. 391/2026) - -<br>Corporate Laws<br>JUSTICE SHARAD KUMAR SHARMA MEMBER (JUDICIAL) AND JATINDRANATH SWAIN MEMBER (TECHNICAL) For the Appellant : Mr. Rajeev Prakash & Mr. Jerin Asher Sojan, Advocates Fo....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nch, was that the Petitioner/Appellant has been saddled with a cost of Rs. 2 lakhs, exclusively on account of certain unintentional dereliction on part of the Counsel, in taking up the proceedings, in the manner in which it was expected by the Learned Tribunal, to have been conducted by the representative of the Petitioner/Appellant, before the Learned NCLT. 3. The reason which has been assigne....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., in the manner it was expected by the Learned Tribunal, by pressing upon the earlier pending applications and then only ought to have proceeded to argue the Company Petition itself on its merit. It is because of the professional imperfection on part of the Counsel, the Learned Tribunal has imposed a cost of Rs. 2 lakhs on the Petitioner/Appellant. 4. If we scrutinise the impugned order, nothin....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....igant should not be made to suffer on account of the Appellant Counsel's mistake, the impugned order would stand quashed, so far it relates to the imposition of cost on the Appellant. 6. During the course of hearing of the Company Appeal, the Learned Counsel for the Appellant submits that, as a consequence of the order passed by the Learned Tribunal on 17.02.2026, the matter was directed to be ....