2026 (3) TMI 1422
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....<br>PRATHIBA M. SINGH AND MADHU JAIN, JJ. For the Petitioner : Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, Adv. For the Respondents : Mr. Anurag Ojha, SSC, Ms. Sangeeta Bharti, SC for Delhi Jal Board. ORDER This hearing has been done through hybrid mode. CM APPL. 69030/2025(for exemption) in W.P.(C) 16799/2025 CM APPL. 69116/2025(for exemption) in W.P.(C) 16817/2025 2. Allowed subject to all just exce....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....tions is that whether the works assigned by the Delhi Jal Board to private contractors would attract GST at the rate of 12% or 18% 6. The submission on behalf of ld. Counsel for the Petitioners is that Delhi Jal Board is a local authority, as held by the GST Department's policy wing decision dated 16th November, 2020. 7. On the other hand, ld. SSC for the GST Department has taken the positio....
TaxTMI