Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2001 (9) TMI 157

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....C.N.B. Nair, Member (J)]. - The appellants manufacture EPAX/EPABX machines. Some of the goods manufactured by the appellants were capitalised for use in their own factory. The value of such goods, according to Balance Sheet for 93-94 was Rs. 17,99,600.15. The impugned order has confirmed duty demand in respect of these goods taking their value as more than Rs. 43 lakhs. The order also held that th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....aking only a loss in their manufacturing activities. With regard to denial of Modvat credit, the appellants' contention is that the goods in question are used for testing and research and development of EPAX and EPABX. They submit that the goods so used are also eligible for Modvat credit as capital goods. During the hearing of the case, the appellants also raised a submission that show cause noti....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ance about the valuation of the goods, since cost data supplied by them has been accepted by the Department. 4. We are not able to find any merit in the appellants' objection to the valuation, except with regard to addition made towards notional profit. Rule 6(b) of Valuation Rules permits valuation either based on value of comparable goods or cost of production. In the present case, the appell....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....le for Modvat credit. It was the appellant's claim that the capitalised goods were being used in testing and R&D. We find no detailed finding on facts in the impugned order on the appellants' claim that the goods were used in testing. If the goods were, in fact, used for testing, they would be eligible for Modvat credit, their using in R&D notwithstanding. 6. The appellants submission regarding....