2026 (3) TMI 1143

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....LE MR. JUSTICE K. VINOD CHANDRAN For the Petitioner(s): Mr. Sanjay Bhatt, Adv. Mr. Rabin Majumder, AOR Mr. Sarthak Bhandari, Adv. Mr. Shivam Majhi, Adv. For the Respondent(s): Mr. Abhishek Saket, Adv. Mr. Sudeep Kumar, AOR Mr. Ajay Singh, Adv. Ms. Manisha, Adv. Ms. Rupali, Adv. Ms. Amita Singh Kalkal, AOR Mr. Rohit Chaudhary, Adv. Mr. Sarul Jain, Adv. Mr. Manu Bansal, Adv. Mr. Rohan Chuadhar....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... 305/2015, 304/2015, 309/2015, 315/2015, 302/2015, 303/2015 and 312/2015. 4. The matter arises under the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881. Cheques were issued to the complainant by and on behalf of the company, M/s Kitply Industry Limited, leading to the filing of cases under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, upon their dishonour. The summoning order issued by the trial Court....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....es filed petitions under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, before the High Court once again. It is on these petitions, that the impugned common judgment and order dated 24.07.2024 came to be passed, requiring the trial Court to reconsider the impleadment application. We are informed that, pursuant to the remand order, the trial Court ordered the impleadment application on 24.09.2024....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n Of India Limited [(2023) 10 SCC 545] would have application. In the light thereof, M/s Kitply Industry Limited can no longer be held liable or responsible for the dishonor of cheques issued long before the new management took over the company. 9. The complainant would be entitled to proceed only against the erstwhile Directors-in-charge/cheque-signatories of the company, in the light of the l....