Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

Fairness in NRRA assignments must balance transparency with finality; belated non compliant bids and post sale acquiescence can bar challenges.

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Fairness and transparency in NRRA assignment under Regulation 37A require contextual application balancing competing interests; the tribunal found that fairness must account for the liquidator and secured creditor's position and did not view denial of consideration of a contemporaneous enhanced offer as patent unfairness where timelines and legitimate expectations of other stakeholders were engaged. Revised bids submitted after prescribed cut off and without required deposits need not be entertained to preserve finality; the appellant's belated, non compliant offer was therefore properly excluded. Acquiescence and waiver by conduct, and vested rights of a purchaser who acted on the sale absent fraud or collusion, bar post sale disturbance. Outcome: appeal dismissed.....