Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

Jurisdiction under Section 153C invalid for lack of incriminating material; additions deleted and earlier years quashed.

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Ten-year block computation was governed by the operative date of the satisfaction note (29-09-2021), which placed AYs 2011-12 and 2012-13 outside the ten-year block and resulted in quashing of those assessments. Separately, the assumption of jurisdiction under the search-related provision was held invalid because the seized material did not contain incriminating information attributable to the assessee; verbatim satisfaction notes, a non contemporaneous excel sheet created by searched person staff and lack of corroboration defeated evidentiary value. Consequent additions were deleted and the revenue appeals dismissed.....