Assessment in earlier name upheld where assessee's communications sustained AO's bona fide belief; share premium additions sustained.

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Assessment in the earlier company name was held valid where the assessee's own communications continued to use the old name, creating a bona fide impression on the tax authority; consequently the assessment was not void. Separately, additions treating subscribed share capital and premium as not genuine were sustained because the offered valuation was unacceptable, investor creditworthiness and non-responses were unsatisfactory, and the transactional sequence indicated profiteering through transfer; therefore the premium component was disallowed and additions upheld under the tax provisions addressing non-genuine share allotments and deemed income.....