Just a moment...

Top
Help
Upgrade to AI Search

We've upgraded AI Search on TaxTMI with two powerful modes:

1. Basic
Quick overview summary answering your query with referencesCategory-wise results to explore all relevant documents on TaxTMI

2. Advanced
• Includes everything in Basic
Detailed report covering:
     -   Overview Summary
     -   Governing Provisions [Acts, Notifications, Circulars]
     -   Relevant Case Laws
     -   Tariff / Classification / HSN
     -   Expert views from TaxTMI
     -   Practical Guidance with immediate steps and dispute strategy

• Also highlights how each document is relevant to your query, helping you quickly understand key insights without reading the full text.Help Us Improve - by giving the rating with each AI Result:

Explore AI Search

Powered by Weblekha - Building Scalable Websites

×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2025 (2) TMI 1624

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....missed as withdrawn. 2) However, prior to the rising of the Bench, in the pre-lunch session, a mention was made by the Counsel for the Appellant that, instead of passing an order of withdrawal, an order may be passed on merits of the matter. 3) The facts which engage consideration in the instant Company Appeal which has been preferred under Section 61, are that the Appellant claims that he happens to be a successful auction purchaser, having been determined so in pursuance to the e-auction, which was conducted on 30.03.2024, for the entire "Konaseema Gas Power Plant Ltd." (herein after to be called as KGPL Plant). At the time, when the Appellant was determined as to be a successful bidder, the bid was awarded in his favour for the ent....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ator vide its email communication dated 21.10.2024, granted an extension of time of 64 days for deposit of the amount, which ended on 26.12.2024. The Appellant was unable to fulfil his commitments of paying the amount as per the extension granted by the Liquidator, despite his efforts to make arrangement for the finances by taking steps even to the extent by mortgaging the property worth Rs. 175 Crores, to ICICI Bank. The ICICI Bank insisted upon site inspection, of the said plant of the Corporate Debtor in order to test its legal and technical viability, before sanction of the requested amount in view of the RBI directions as per Section 21 and Section 35(A) of the Banking Regulation Act, 1949, and in the light of the Judgment of the Hon'b....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sfaction so that they can process the loan application. It is contended by the Appellant that, instead of considering the Application on its merit which was preferred on 31.01.2025 and taken up for consideration on 11.02.2025, the Learned Tribunal has proceeded to pass the order fixing a matter to be considered on 27.03.2025. It is this order of the adjournment which is impugned in the Appeal. The Impugned Order is extracted hereunder: - "ORDER: IA(IBC)/294/2024 Present: Mr. Swapnil Newaskar, Ld. Counsel for the Applicant. Mr. Varun Srinivasan, Ld. Counsel for the Liquidator/Respondent. Mr. Varun Srinivasan, Ld. Counsel has taken service on behalf of the Respondent. For filing of counter, matter is adjour....