Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2001 (1) TMI 120

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... "I hold that the ground for disallowing the credit is too flimsy and accordingly, I hold that the subject Modvat credit is admissible to the appellants. However, I also hold that the appellants should have approached the jurisdictional officers for accepting the rectified documents before taking the Modvat credit and to that extent, I hold that imposition of penalty on the appellants is justif....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....57-I and imposed a penalty of Rs. 15,000/- under Rule 173Q. The appellants filed an appeal before the ld. Commissioner (Appeals) who held as indicated above. 4. Arguing the case for the appellants Ms. Shruti Chaudhary, ld. Counsel submits that the ld. Commissioner (Appeals) had held that the ground of disallowing credit was too flimsy and also that the subject Modvat credit is admissible to the....