2026 (3) TMI 139
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ondents : Mr. R. Suresh Kumar, Additional Government Pleader ORDER This writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned order dated 16.12.2024 and its consequential summary order dated 19.12.2024 passed by the second respondent. 2. Mr. R. Suresh Kumar, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice on behalf of the respondents. By consent of the parties, the main writ petition i....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... 5. On the other hand, the learned Additional Government Pleader appearing for the respondents would submit that the respondents had uploaded the notices in the GST Online Portal. But the petitioner failed to avail the said opportunity. Further, he has fairly admitted that no opportunity of personal hearing was provided to the petitioner prior to the passing of impugned order. Therefore, he req....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ing the proposals contained in the show cause notice. 8. No doubt, sending notice by uploading in portal is a sufficient service, but, the Officer who is sending the repeated reminders, inspite of the fact that no response from the petitioner to the show cause notices etc., the Officer should have applied his/her mind and explored the possibility of sending notices by way of other modes prescri....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... would ultimately achieve the object of the GST Act. Therefore, this Court finds that there is a lack of opportunities being provided to serve the notices/orders etc., effectively to the petitioner. 10. Further, it was submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner is willing to pay 25% of the disputed tax amount to the respondents. In such view of the matter, this Cour....
TaxTMI