Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2000 (4) TMI 133

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....is common order. 2.The appellants were engaged in the manufacture of biscuits, classifiable under sub-heading No. 1905.11 of the Central Excise Tariff. The biscuits were sold under the brand name "Meghraj" which belonged to M/s. Kay Aar Biscuits (Pvt.) Ltd. Under show cause notices dated 6-6-1994 and dated 25-8-1994, it was alleged that as the biscuits were sold under the brand name "Meghraj", which was a registered trade mark of Kay Aar Biscuits (Pvt.) Ltd., who were using this trade mark for manufacture of biscuits themselves, the appellants were not eligible to the benefit of small scale exemption notification No. 1/93-C.E., dated 28-2-1993 as amended by Notification No. 59/94-C.E., dated 1-3-1994. The Asstt. Commissioner of Central E....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....-1993 as amended by Notification No. 59/94, dated 1-3-1994, the benefit of small scale exemption was not available to the excisable goods bearing brand name or trade name, (registered or not) of another person. Para-7 of that Notification provided as under :- "The exemption contained in this Notification shall not apply to the specified goods where a manufacturer affixes the specified goods with a brand name or trade name (registered or not) of another person, who is not eligible for the grant of exemption under this Notification." We are not concerned with the second Proviso to this para-7 of the said Notification. It has been explained in Explanation VIII during the relevant time as under : - 'Brand name' or 'trade name' sh....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....3)        That party No. 2 has put a unit for manufacture of wafers in NOIDA and it desires to manufacture wafers under the brand name "MEGHRAJ". (4)        That party No. 1 has specifically allowed party No. 2 to use its Trade Mark for the manufacture of WAFERS alone with the condition that this will not be used on any other products besides Wafers without their consent in writing. That this agreement is valid for a period of three years effective from this day, whereafter, it may be renewed as per mutual consent in writing. Parties have put their signature in presence of the witness on this day and year mentioned above." 5.It As thus seem that M/s. Kay Aar B....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....r person is affixed thereto. The reference to the brand name or trade name of another person is to the trade name belonging to another person. In the Stroud's Judicial Dictionary, 'of' means "belonging to" - [Opus India v. CCE (1992 (62) E.L.T. 447 (Tribunal) para-9]. According to Black's Law Dictionary - 6th Edition Page 1080, 'of' has been held, among other meanings, equivalent to "belonging to". In the case of Melluish (Inspector of Taxes) v. B.M.I. (No.9) Ltd. and Ors - 1996 (218) ITR 548 (HL), it has been held that a "property belongs to a person if he is in law or in equity the absolute owner of it. Fox L.J. in Stokes v. Costain Property Investments Ltd. - 1984 (1) W.L.R 763 said at page 769, I agree that "belong" and "belong....