2000 (12) TMI 175
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... been imposed upon the other two appellants. 2. Briefly stated the facts of the case are as under :- 1.1 As per the Revenue, the two appellants namely Shri Ram Binoy Prasad and Shri Sushil Kumar Raut were intercepted while travelling in a bus coming from Samastipur at Bighoo more near Hajipur on 26-3-1993. Their search resulted in recovery of 12 pieces of silver bars concealed in specially made jackets. On interrogation, the two persons disclosed that the silver in question was brought from Janakpur in Nepal and was being carried on behalf of one of Shri Jugeswar Dayal. Inasmuch as the appellants failed to produce any documents showing the legal importation of the silver in question, the Officers seized the same. 11.2 Based upon th....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....question was not having any foreign marks upon them and the entire case of the Revenue is based upon the two statements of the two employees of the third appellant. The said statements have been challenged as being involuntary and having been extracted under duress and threat. For this, my attention has been drawn to the Injury Report given by the doctor of the jail. It has been argued that if the said two statements are kept out of consideration, there is no other evidence on record indicating illegal smuggled character of the silver in question. Proof of other evidence has also been raised before me. 4. I find that admittedly, there are no foreign markings on the silver in question. There are only statements of the two employees of Shr....
Generate professional replies, appeals, opinions to Show Cause Notices, assessment orders, audit objections, and other legal communications using TaxTMI's AI Drafter.
TaxTMI