2023 (9) TMI 1751
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ustice A.V.Ravindra Babu For the Petitioner : N Vijay For the Respondent : SC For Income Tax ORDER: PER UDPR, J. This writ petition is filed seeking mandamus declaring the impugned order passed by the 1st respondent in respect of PAN No.AHIPK5818R in DIN No: ITBA/AST/S/147/2021-22/10410 92618(1), dated 20.03.2022, for the Assessment Year 2017-18 as illegal, arbitrary and to set asid....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....of the Act, dated 29.06.2021. For the same reason, the petitioner could not reply to the said notice. The said notice contains the details of cash deposits of Rs.2,47,57,120/- in the current account and Rs.32,94,000/- in savings account and also the cash withdrawals of Rs.3,30,52,749/- and details of TDS paid and explanations were sought. (b) The further case of the petitioner is that while the....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ly for the reasons mentioned above, the impugned assessment order was passed on 20.03.2022 basing on the wrong facts. Ultimately, petitioner submits that due to his sickness, the petitioner could not give replies to the earlier notices and the petitioner may be given an opportunity of filing an explanation in respect of two cash deposits i.e., Rs.2,47,57,120/- and Rs.32,94,000/- for consideration ....


TaxTMI