2026 (2) TMI 115
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....MR. JUSTICE NONGMEIKAPAM KOTISWAR SINGH For the Petitioner(s): Mr. Ashish Pandey, AOR, Mr. Mukesh Kumar, Adv., Mr. Prateek Rai, Adv., Mr. Subhash Raghav, Adv., Mr. Akash, Adv., Mr. Srajan Shankar Kulshrestha, Adv., Mr. Danish Alvi, Adv., Ms. Aishwarya Sharma, Adv., Mr. Mahesh Dutt Shukla, Adv., Dr. Varnit Shamra, Adv., Mr. Amit Kumar, Adv., Mr. S. Nagamuthu, Sr. Adv., Mr. Raja Choudhary, Adv., ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ng Act, 2002 (for short the "PMLA"). 3. We have heard the learned counsel appearing for the parties. 4. Learned Senior counsel for the appellants submits that the two appellants Rahul Parashar and David Mario Denis are the accused in the predicated offence, except the appellant-Devender Singh. The total amount received by the appellant-Rahul Parashar is a sum of Rs.73 lakhs. 5. The sum an....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....esent case, it is, therefore, submitted that in view of the rigors of Section 45 of the PMLA, there is no need to interfere with the impugned orders which have been passed by the High Court. 9. The fact which still remains, is that the appellants have been under incarceration for more than two years and six months, and the trial has just commenced. 10. Considering the above position, we are ....




TaxTMI
TaxTMI