Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2025 (3) TMI 1592

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....(here-in-after referred to as "the Act") relevant to the Assessment Year 2012-13. 2. The assessee in this appeal taken following grounds of appeal :- Grounds of Appeal Tax effect relating to each Ground of appeal 1 On the facts and circumstances of the case and applicable law, Ld. CIT(A) erred in sustaining the assessment order passed by Ld. AO under section 143(3) which is contrary to the material on records and provisions of the Act, unjustand bad in law. NA 2 On the facts and circumstances of the case and applicable law, Ld. CIT(A) erred in sustaining the adhoc disallowance of 25% on account of distribution expenses amounting to Rs. 17,00,701. 5,10,210 3 On the facts and circumstances of the case and appl....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....establish his institute as reputed institution like that are in Kota (Rajasthan). That for the said purpose, the assessee had to incur advertisement and publicity expenditure to make the institute popular. The ld. counsel has further submitted that all the bills and vouchers were produced before the Assessing Officer, however, the Assessing Officer without pointing out any specific defect or infirmity in the same observed that some of the expenditure was shown by way of self prepared vouchers. He, therefore, disallowed 25% of the advertisement expenses. The ld. counsel has submitted that the disallowances made by the Assessing Officer was not justified. The ld. D.R. on the other hand has relied upon the findings of the Assessing Officer. ....