Loading...

⚠ โœ•
❮ Top
☎ Help
Draft upto 3 replies to a
tax notice โ€” FREE ๐ŸŽ‰ โœ•

150 credits ยท 30 days

โ€ข Basic Search โ†’ 1 Credit
โ€ข Advanced Search โ†’ 3 Credits
โ€ข Drafter โ†’ 20 to extract + 25 per issue
(โ‰ˆ upto 2-3 drafts on us)

Already used our earlier 20-Credit Demo?
You are still eligible for this new 150-Credit Demo.

Activate your FREE Demo โ†’
☰
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedbackโœ•

Contact Us At :

✉ E-mail: [email protected]

✆ Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters 0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2000 (2) TMI 137

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....n mortar, orcast, castable refractory, ramming mass, foundry fluxes and chemicals, grinding wheel and D.C. Motor. 2. The facts of the case in brief are that the appellants manufacture M.S. Ingots and Billets. They claimed Modvat credit on mortar, orcast, castable refractory, ramming mass, foundry fluxes, chemicals, griding wheel and D.C. Motar. The Commissioner (A) has allowed the benefit of Mo....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....se of Bhusan Steel & Alloys Limited held that "In reply, Shri J.S. Agarwal, Advocate submitted that the Tribunal is taking a consistent view and following the Calcutta High Court in the case of Singh Alloys & Steel Limited v. Asstt. Collector of Central Excise ‑ 1993 (66) E.L.T. 594 (Calcutta); that he further submitted that the Hon'ble Supreme Court had admitted the appeal on the same su....