2024 (10) TMI 1763

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., Punjab State Crime, S.A.S. Nagar Mohali. 2. Prosecution story, set up in the present case as per the version in the FIR read as under :- 'One letter from the office of Director, Bureau of Investigation, Punjab, Chandigarh bearing No.2604//C.C-2 dated 29/07/2024 along with letter No. 27312/VB/A.S.-5 dated 09/07/2024 from Joint Director (Complaint Cell) and Chief Director Vigilance Bureau Punjab, inquiry report alongwith statements and record received in police station state crime. On the said letter dairy No. of Police station State Crime bearing No. 311/Diary/PS/ST/CR dated 29-07-2024 is entered. The details of the received letter are: from Director, Bureau of Investigation, Punjab, Chandigarh. To S.H.O., police station state ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....enhpur, Hasanpur, Sector 122,123,124, 125, District SAS Nagar for approval in GMADA. This project was approved by GMADA vide letter no. 1685 CTP (PE)/MPR23. The officials of GMADA approved this project in my land without my consent. Now I feel defrauded by the GMADA officials. Apart from this 1 also want to inform you that the GMADA officials illegally approved Shamlat land of village Seenhpur as reserved for EWS Flats in this mega project. This approved mega project 3.426 acres land which was shamlat of Village Seenhpur, GMADA officials illegally approved this land as EWS flats for M/s Bajwa Developers Ltd. This smells of great conspiracy between the M/s Bajwa Developers Ltd. Chief Town Planner GMADA and other officials of GMADA. So it is ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....as been furnished to the counsel opposite. He has referred to the paragraph No. 7 of that affidavit which reads as under :- '7. That the aforesaid FIR has been registered against the petitioner on the allegations made in the statement of Manvir Singh, Advocate, Notary Public, Tehsil Kharar who has stated that the said stamp papers/affidavits were attested by him but these Ostamp papers/affidavits were attested by him on the asking of A accused/petitioner Deepak Kumar and his fellow employees namely and Shampy.' Apart from that, it has also been argued on behalf of the learned State Counsel that the custodial interrogation of the petitioner is required to verify as to when and where the petitioner procured the forged affidavit, t....