Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2026 (1) TMI 1425

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ion. i. Employer's contributions under Section 36(1)(iv) and employees' contributions covered under Section 36(1)(va) read with Section 2(24)(x) are fundamentally different in nature and must be treated separately. ii. Employees' contribution deducted from their salaries are deemed to be income under Section 2(24)(x) and are held in trust by the employer. The employers can claim deduction only if they deposit these amounts on or before the statutory due date under Section 36(1)(va). iii. The non-obstante clause in Section 43B cannot be applied to employees' contributions governed by Section 36(1)(va). iv. Alom Extrusions (supra) has been distinguished as the same has not considered Sections 2(....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s to be so, unless it is credited by the assessee - employer to the employee's account in the relevant fund on or before the due date specified under the relevant PF, ESI Act. 7. The employee's contribution towards PF, ESI received by the assessee - employer is his income under Section 2(24)(x) and if he wants to have it deducted from his income under Section 36(1)(va), he must credit the same to the employee's account in the relevant fund on or before the due date specified under the relevant PF,ESI Act. 8. The aforesaid view is supported by the following judgments of the High Courts:- (i) Unifac Management Services (India) (P.) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT [2018] 100 taxmann.com244 [2019] 260 Taxman 60/[2018] 409 ITR 225 (Ma....