Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2026 (1) TMI 1311

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....nder section 272A(1)(d) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act') relating to the Assessment Year 2018-19. 2. The registry has noted that there is delay of 30 days in filing the above appeal. The assessee explained that he is a farmer, residing in an interior village and has no access to internet facilities which has resulted in non-compliance to the notices issued by the Revenue Authorities and also resulted in passing exparte assessment order as well as penalty order, therefore one more opportunity be given to the assessee by condoning the delay of 30 days in filing the above appeal. 3. Ld. Sr. D.R. appearing for the Revenue has no serious objection in condoning the delay, thereby the delay of 30 days in fil....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ows: "6.1.1 The claim that the appellant did not receive the notice u/s 142(1) is not tenable, as the penalty order clearly shows that Notices and reminders were issued on multiple dates (13.03.2023, 23.05.2023, 14.06.2023, 11.07.2023), all of which were not complied with. Communications were sent through the email ID provided by the appellant in the PAN application. Additionally, a physical notice was served via the designated Verification Unit on 15.09.2023, yet no compliance was made even thereafter. The explanation regarding the advocate not forwarding emails from the department is not a reasonable cause under section 273B. The appellant, being the responsible taxpayer, should have ensured that communications made to h....