Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / RSS

2026 (1) TMI 1215

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Saha, Mr. Avirup Roy Sanyal, Ms. Sucheta Pal.   ORDER 1. Affidavit-of-service filed in Court is taken on record. 2. By an order dated 14th November, 2025, this Court directed the petitioner to implead the Sai Fertilizer Pvt. Ltd. as respondent no. 14. 3. Accordingly, the petitioner has impleaded the Sai Fertilizer Pvt. Ltd. as added respondent being the respondent no. 14. 4. The petitioner has filed the present writ application praying for a direction upon the respondents to release the amount of Rs. 20,00,000/- (Rupees twenty lakhs), which was kept as hold in account no. 019081400008025, which is the account of the added respondent and a direction upon the respondent no. 8 that is, the Yes Bank Limited, Dalhousie Branc....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....(Rupees twenty lakhs) as well as Rs. 5,00,000/- (Rupees five lakhs) in the account of the petitioner but the Yes Bank Limited instead of remitting the said amount has kept the said amount on hold. In spite of several representations made by the petitioner, the Yes Bank Limited has not returned the said amount. 8. The matter reached up to the office of the RBI Ombudsman and the Ombudsman has passed an order on 21st March, 2025 holding that the customer himself entered the wrong beneficiary account number/account details and there does not appear to be any deficiency on the part of the regulator entity while facilitating the transaction and accordingly, he closed the complaint made by the petitioner. 9. The respondent nos. 8 to 11 have ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....6 wherein the added respondent stated "that on 23rd December, 2025, a sum of Rs. 20,00,000/- (Rupees Twenty Lakhs) was credited to our aforementioned account via RTGS from the Petitioner No. 1. Subsequently, on 2nd April 2025, a further sum of Rs. 5,00,000/- (Rupees Five Lakhs) was credited to the same account. I say that the said aggregate sum of Rs. 25,00,000/- does not belong to Sai Fertilizers Private Limited. We have no business relationship with the Petitioners regarding this transaction, and we understand that these funds were transferred to our account due to a clerical/typographical error by the Petitioner (typing Account ending in "8025" instead of "8005"." 13. In the affidavit, the added respondent has further stated that h....