2026 (1) TMI 1603
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Mr. Mahesh Agarwal, Adv., Mr. Ankur Saigal, Adv., Ms. Stuti Gujral, Adv., Ms. Vidushi Sabharwal, Adv., Mr. Vipin Kumar, Adv., Mr. Abhinabh Garg, Adv., Ms. Sukriti Bhatnagar, Adv., Mr. Arjun V. Harihar, Adv., Mr. E. C. Agrawala, AOR. For Respondent(s) Mr. S.V. Raju, A.S.G., Mr. Gurmeet Singh Makker, AOR, Mr. Zoheb Hussian, Adv., Mr. Hitarth Raja, Adv., Mr. Annam Venkatesh, Adv. ORDER 1. Le....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... 2023, have not been complied with, the High Court, vide the impugned order, has reversed the same with a clear finding that the grounds of arrest, along with relevant documents, have been served to the arrestees, appellants herein, who have acknowledged the same. Intimation of arrest was given, to the wife of appellant No. 1 and mother of appellant No. 2, which has been acknowledged by her, and t....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....hat the intimations (Notice to Relatives) of the arrests of the respondents were immediately given to Smt Vandana Choudhary at 11:00 PM on 05.06.2025, who happens to be the wife of respondents No. 1 and the mother of the respondent No. 2. The intimations have been duly acknowledged by her by putting her signature in the respective intimations. The contents of the intimations have already been repr....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... Chief Judicial Magistrate. 6. We are conscious of the fact that the investigation is not complete and the respondent-Union of India is of the view that custodial interrogation, of appellant No. 1, is required. 7. In such view of the matter, we grant custodial interrogation, of appellant No. 1, for consecutive days starting from the 28th of January, 2026 to the 31st of January, 2026 till 5 p....
TaxTMI