2026 (1) TMI 842
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....'BLE SHRI JUSTICE NARESH KUMAR CHANDRAVANSHI For the Petitioner: Mr. Anmol Singh, Advocate. For the Respondent No. 1: Mr. Niraj Baghel, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. Ramakant Mishra, DSGI. For Respondents No. 2 & 3: Mr. Maneesh Sharma, Advocate. ORDER 1. Heard. 2. This petition has been preferred by the petitioner seeking following relief(s) : "10.1 Issue an appr....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....tatutory requirements; 10.4 Direct the Respondents to forthwith release, withdraw, lift or annul any lien, attachment, debit freeze, garnishee proceedings or other coercive recovery measures initiated pursuant to or in furtherance of the impugned adjudication order dated 05.02.2025; 10.5 Pass any other order or issue such directions as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit in light....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....vice of notice and even after providing due opportunity of personal hearing vide notices dated 07.06.2024, 28.06.2024, 20.11.2024 and 04.12.2024, as has been mentioned in para 20 of the impugned order, the petitioner did not appear before the adjudicating authority/respondent No. 3, therefore, impugned order has been passed. He further submits that since final order has been passed by the adjudica....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....hearing has not been provided to the petitioner. Further, impugned order (Annexure P/1) was passed by the adjudicating authority/respondent No. 3 on 05.02.2025, but instead of filing appeal under Section 107 of the Act, 2017, it is being challenged by the petitioner by filing writ petition, that too, after about 11 months from the date of passing of impugned order. 7. Having considered the afor....
TaxTMI