Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

Seized incriminating documents and receipts determining tax additions for student fees, property investment, and stamp duty - partly upheld

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Whether incriminating material seized in search sustains additions under section 153A - tribunal, following Benefit Tradelink, finds the issue against the assessee and dismisses the ground challenging additions. Addition as income under section 56(2)(vi) for amounts received as student fees - since receipts were offered to tax before the Settlement Commission and constituted student fees, section 56(2)(vi) is not attracted and no addition is warranted. Unexplained investment in property - pro rata contribution recomputed and limited to Rs.1,42,000, ground partly allowed. Purchase of specified land - amounts already offered before the Settlement Commission; no further addition. Stamp duty/registration expenses paid by relatives and not offered earlier - Revenue free to tax those amounts. - ITAT....