2025 (7) TMI 1959

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....am And The Hon'ble Justice Chaitali Chatterjee (Das) For the Appellants : Mr. Ankit Kanodia Ms. Megha Agarwal Mr. Piyush Khaitan Mr. Jitesh Shah For the State : Mr. T.M. Siddique, Sr. Adv., Ld. AGP Mr. Tanoy Chakraborty Mr. Saptak Sanyal (Judgment of the Court was delivered by T.S. SIVAGNANAM, C.J.) 1. This intra-Court appeal filed by the writ petitioners is directed against the order ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....rtained i.e. to decide the jurisdictional issue, we are of the view that the writ petition filed by the appellants herein should also be heard along with the said writ petition since the Court was prima facie satisfied that a jurisdictional point has to be considered and therefore admitted the writ petition. 4. Sofar as the interim protection is concerned, there is no scope of passing any inter....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... 13354 of 2025 shall also be heard along with the aforementioned two writ petitions. In view of the above, I.A. No. CAN 1 of 2024 is disposed of. 6. The reason for tagging W.P.A. 13354 of 2025 is that the statutory appeal filed by the appellants as against the order of adjudication passed by the Bureau of Investigation was not decided on merits but was dismissed on the ground of limitation. Th....