2003 (8) TMI 63

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....sp; [Order per : Justice K.K. Usha, President]. - These are the applications filed by the appellants in appeal Nos. E/1151/2000-NB(A) and E/1192/2000-NB(A) seeking a direction to the respondents to refund an amount of Rs. one crore paid  by the applicants as pre-deposit pursuant to the direction given by this Tribunal in Stay Order Nos. 194-195/2000, dated 10-8-2000. The final order was pa....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....C.)] in above appeals which reads as under: "Delay condoned Appeal is admitted Proceedings in remand are stayed." 3. It is seen from the above order that the stay granted by the Hon'ble Supreme Court is limited to the remand proceedings. Therefore, we do not find any reason to reject the claim of the applicants before us for refund of pre-deposit made by them under Section 35F of the C....