2025 (12) TMI 1374

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

..... CHOUDHARY, MEMBER (JUDICIAL) AND MR. SANJIV SRIVASTAVA, MEMBER (TECHNICAL) Shri Prashant Shukla, Advocate for the Applicant Shri Santosh Kumar, Authorized Representative for the Respondent ORDER SANJIV SRIVASTAVA: The present Miscellaneous Application for Rectification of Mistake in terms of Section 35C (2) of the Central Excise Act, 1944, has been filed by the Appellant stating t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... Order dated 21.08.2024 and the records of the case. We have also taken into consideration the submissions made during the course of arguments on the application. 6. We observe that this application has been filed pointing to the fact that decision relied upon by the Appellant/ Appellant counsel has not been considered by the bench while recording the argument. The decision of Hon'ble Delhi Hig....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....t. Atonement to the wronged party by the court or Tribunal for the wrong committed by it has nothing to do with the concept of inherent power to review. In the present case, the Tribunal was justified in exercising its powers under section 254(2) when it was pointed out to the Tribunal that the judgment of the coordinate bench was placed before the Tribunal when the original order came to be passe....