Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

2025 (12) TMI 1330

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....l six substantive grounds challenge this action of the Ld. Addl./JCIT(A). 2. Before us, the Ld. AR argued that the filing of Form 67 within the stipulated time was a directory provision and not mandatory. It was averred that the US-India DTAA would come to the rescue of the assessee in this regard. 2.1 The Ld. DR relied on the orders of authorities below. 3. We have considered the rival submissions and have also gone through the records before us. We have been made aware of a Coordinate Bench decision rendered in the case of Timirbaran Mazumder, ITA No. 1905/Kol/2024. In this decision the issues involved are identical to the present case as in that case also processing u/s 143(1) of the Act was done and the matter involved the US-India DTAA. The relevant portions from the decision in the case of Timirbaran Mazumder (supra) deserve to be extracted: "5. We have gone through the submissions made and also considered the facts of the case. Similar issue arose in the case of Jaspal Singh Bindra vs. DCIT in ITA No. 1826/KOL/2024 order dated 19.11.2024 in which the Coordinate Bench (in which one of us was a member) has held as under: "7. Similar issue arose in th....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....for non-compliance with procedural requirement that is prescribed in the rules. 10. Further, we would like to mention that rule 128(9) provides that Form No. 67 should be filed on or before the due date of filing the return of income as prescribed u/s 139(1) of the Act. However, the rule nowhere provides that if the said Form No. 67 is not filed within the required time frame, the relief as sought by the assessee u/s 90 of the Act would be denied. It is therefore evident that if the intention of the legislature were to deny the foreign tax credit, either the Act or the rules would have specifically provided that the foreign tax credit would be disallowed if the assessee does not file Form No. 67 within the due date prescribed under section 139(1) of the Act. We further note that Filing of Form No. 67 is a procedural/directory requirement and is not a mandatory requirement and violation of procedural norm does not extinguish the substantive right of claiming the credit of FTC. In support of the claim, the assessee has relied upon several decisions including the following decision: i. CIT vs. G.M. Knitting Industries (P) Ltd. 71 Tuxmann.com 35(SC) ii. Brind....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ause, Rule 128(9) does not provide for disallowance of FTC in case of delay in filing Form No 67 This view is fortified by the decision of coordinate bench of this Tribunal in case of Ms. Brindu Kumar Krishna us. ITO in ITA no. 454/ Bang/2021 by order dated 17/11/2021. 7. It's a trite law that DTAA overrides the provisions of the Act and the Rules, as held by various High Courts, which has also been approved by Hon'ble Supreme Court in case of Engineering Analysis Centre of Excellence (P) Ltd reported in (2021) 432 ITR 471. 8. We accordingly, hold that FTC cannot be denied to the assessee. Assessee is directed to file the relevant details/evidences in support of its claim. We thus remand this issue back to the Ld.AO to consider the claim of assessee in accordance with law, based on the verification carried out in respect of the supporting documents filed by assessee. 14. In Vikash Daga Vs ACIT Circle-3 (1) Gurgaon ITA No.2536/Del/2022, the ITAT DELHI BENCH 'H', NEW DELHI vide order dated 14/06/2023 have held that: 8. We have given a thoughtful consideration to the orders of the authorities below. The undisputed fact is that the as....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....s must be read in the context of the Act and the DTAA impacting the rights, liabilities and disabilities of the parties. 13. In the case of Purushothama Reddy Vankireddy (supra) also the Co-ordinate Bench of the Tribunal, in the similar circumstances, allowed the appeal of assessee for FTC claim. Respectfully following the same, we are of the considered Page 6 of 8 ITA No. 337/Hyd/2023 opinion that the decisions relied upon by the assessee are applicable to the facts of the case and the grounds raised by the assessee are accordingly allowed. 14. In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed." 16. We have also gone through the decision of the Hon'ble Madras High Court in the case of Duraiswamy Kumaraswamy us. PCIT (supra) and found that the facts are identical to the facts of the case of the assessee and the decision is squarely applicable to the facts of the case of the assessee. In that case, the petitioner was resident of India and had filed Indian ITR and claimed benefit of FTC u/s 90/91 of the Act row. Article 24 of the India-Kenya DTAA. During the year, he had income of both Kenya and India but while filing the Indian ITR for the impugned asse....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....k to the respondent to make reassessment by taking into consideration of the FTC filed by the petitioner on 02.02.2021. The respondent is directed to give due credit to the Kenya income of the petitioner and pass the final assessment order. Further, it is made clear that the impugned order is set wade only to the extent of disallowing of FTC clam made by the petitioner und hence, the first respondent is directed to consider only on the aspect of rejection of FTC clam within a period of 8 weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order" 17. Respectfully following the order of the Hon'ble Madras High Court in the case of Duraiswamy Kumaraswamy vs. PCIT (supra) and concurring with the views held by the coordinate Benches of the Tribunal (supra), we hold that merely because the assessee could not file Form No. 67 within the prescribed time limit as per the provisions of rule 128(9) of the Income-tax rules, 1962, as it stood during the year under consideration, will not preclude the assessee from claiming the benefit of the foreign tax credit in respect of taxes paid outside India. Therefore, the claim of the assessee is allowed and the Assessing Officer is directed to....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....resident is a company by which a surtax is payable in India, the deduction in respect of income-tax paid in the United States shall be allowed in the first instance from income-tax payable by the company in India and as to the balance, if any, from surtax payable by it in India. 3. For the purposes of allowing relief from double taxation pursuant to this article, income shall be deemed to arise as follows : income derived by a resident of a Contracting State which may be taxed in the other Contracting State in accordance with this Convention [other than solely by reason of citizenship in accordance with paragraph 3 of article 1 (General Scope)] shall be deemed to arise in that other State ; income derived by a resident of a Contracting State which may not be taxed in the other Contracting State in accordance with the Convention shall be deemed to arise in the first-mentioned State. Notwithstanding the preceding sentence, the determination of the source of income for purposes of this article shall be subject to such source rules in the domestic laws of the Contracting States as apply for the purpose of limiting the foreign tax credit. The precedin....