2025 (12) TMI 1246
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....anil Banerjee Mr. Tanay Agarwal Mr. Priyanshu Agarwal For the respondent Nos. 3,4 & 5: Mr. Vipul Kundalia, Sr. Adv. Mr. Bhaskar Prasad Banerjee Mr. Tapan Bhanja. ORDER 1. Affidavit-in-opposition filed on behalf of the respondent Nos. 3, 4 and 5 is taken on record. 2. CAN 2 of 2025 is an application seeking inter alia the following direction: "a. Dispose off the instant writ pe....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
...." as would be apparent from the prayer extracted hereinabove, however, Mr. Bagaria, learned advocate appearing for the petitioners, submits on instructions that the petitioners are not pressing the said prayer for the CESTAT to hear the petitioners' proposed appeal without insisting upon pre-deposit of 7.5% of the impugned demand. He submits that the petitioners would be in a position to meet the ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....6. As requested by the parties, it is clarified that this Court has not gone into the merits of the matter and all points are left open to be urged before CESTAT and be decided by the CESTAT in accordance with law. 7. With the aforesaid observations, WPA 7675 of 2020 stands "dismissed as withdrawn" with liberty to the petitioners to file appeal within two weeks and meet with the statutory pre-d....
TaxTMI