2024 (12) TMI 1678

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....E ARAVIND KUMAR For the Petitioner : Mr. K M Nataraj, A.S.G., Mrs. Archana Pathak Dave, A.S.G., Mr. Mukesh Kumar Maroria, AOR, Mrs. Chitrangda Rastaravara, Adv., Mr. Anmol Chandan, Adv., Mr. Siddharth Dharmadhikari, Adv., Mr. Santosh Kumar, Adv., Mr. Jitender Kumar Tripathi, Adv., Mr. Alabhya Dhamija, Adv., Ms. Sweksha, Adv., Mr. Sharath Nambiar, Adv. For the Respondent : Mr. Nachiketa Joshi....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... occasion. In any case, the respondents having been charged under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B of the IPC, the High Court has quashed the criminal proceedings without even going into the merits of the case especially when the chargesheet has already been filed after investigation. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents submitted that perusal of the evidence available shows tha....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....unsel for the appellant that the High Court did not even go into the charges pertaining to Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 and 120B of the IPC. We are also in agreement with the submission made by learned senior counsel appearing for the appellant that there is no need for grant of sanction under Section 197 of IPC. 6. In such view of the matter, we are inclined to set aside the impugned judgment i....