2025 (12) TMI 1063
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....m Sridharan,. For the Respondent Nos.1, 2, 3 and 5: Ms. Jyoti Chavan,. Assistant Commissioner of State Tax: Mr. Prashant Barve, is present. ORAL ORDER (PER M. S. SONAK, J.) : 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. Rule. The Rule is made returnable immediately, at the request and with the consent of the learned counsel for the parties. 3. The challenge in this Peti....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ssions on the day to day operations. The payments of salaries and other expenses are virtually stalled. 6. Mr. Parghi submits that if some directions are issued to the Respondents to dispose of the adjudication proceedings within a time bound schedule, then, the Petitioner will not press the challenge to the impugned provisional attachment order. He submitted that this will enable the Petitione....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....at will cover the provisional liability demand. Similarly, the Respondents, can have no objection to completing the adjudication proceedings because ultimately, even the impugned order is only a provisional attachment order. The life of such order, in terms of section 83(2) is only of one year. 10. Therefore, we dispose of this Petition by passing the following order : (a) The Petition....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....5 and six other show cause notices that are proposed to be issued by the Respondents will be completed as expeditiously as possible and in any event before 30 May 2026. The learned counsel for the Petitioner agrees that if six further show cause notices are issued, the Petitioner will file response within four weeks of the receipt of such show cause notices without seeking any extension of time. ....
TaxTMI