Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
>
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
TMI Blog
Home / TMI Blogs / RSS

Appeal succeeds: Rule 8D disallowance invalid without 14A(2) satisfaction; business, repair expenses allowed as revenue under 37(1)

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ITAT allowed the assessee's appeal substantially. The disallowance u/s 14A r.w.r. 8D was largely deleted, holding that AO failed to record the mandatory satisfaction u/s 14A(2), rendering application of Rule 8D jurisdictionally invalid; the assessee's suo motu disallowance was accepted, with Rule 8D(2)(i) and 8D(2)(ii) disallowances deleted, and Rule 8D(2)(iii) confined to investments actually yielding exempt income. Disallowances of professional fees to a group foundation and expenses of the UK branch/guest house were held revenue in nature and allowable u/s 37(1), including refurbishment expenses treated as repairs. However, payment for installation of a new pump system was held capital in nature, with depreciation allowable.....