2025 (12) TMI 758
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
.... For the Respondent: Mr. Ram Ochani,. P.C.:- 1. Heard Mr. Murli Kukreja, Petitioner in person and Mr. Ochani, learned counsel for the Respondent. 2. The Petitioner challenges the Orders-in-Original dated 5 March 2023, 9 May 2024, 19 September 2025 and 13 August 2025 along with the orders made in Appeals against such orders. 3. The Petitioner argues that the Authorities have incorrec....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....f Section 129 of the Customs Act. Therefore, it would not be appropriate to bypass such statutory remedies and entertain this Petition. 5. Apart from submitting that the Petitioner's fundamental rights have been violated, there are no convincing grounds made out by the Petitioner to persuade us to deviate from the normal practice of exhaustion of alternate remedies provided under the statute. T....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....f India Writ Petition (L) No.33260 of 2023 decided on 11 November 2024., this Court has considered the law on exhaustion of alternate remedies. To a similar effect, the orders made by this Court in Writ Petition No.16140 of 2024, along with other companion petitions, wherein this Court was of the view that these are not extraordinary cases in which the Court should circumvent or short-circuit the ....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....id decisions and by following the precedents referred to therein, we decline to entertain this Petition. However, we leave it to the Petitioner to appeal to the CESTAT against the impugned orders, subject to compliance with the prescribed legal formalities. 11. Suppose the Petitioner institutes such Appeals within six weeks from today. In that case, the CESTAT is directed to consider such appea....
TaxTMI