2025 (12) TMI 648

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... PETITION NO.3066 OF 2024 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1476 OF 2025 IN WRIT PETITION NO.3066 OF 2024, WRIT PETITION NO.3065 OF 2024 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1475 OF 2025, IN WRIT PETITION NO.3065 OF 2024, WRIT PETITION NO.3063 OF 2024 M.S. Sonak And Advait M Sethna, JJ For the Petitioner : Mr Bharat Raichandani (Through V.C.) a/w Adv. Dhanistha Kawale i/by UBR Legal Advocates For the Respondent : Mr Karan Adik a/w Ms. Sangeeta Yadav ORAL ORDER Per M. S. Sonak, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. In some of the Petitions in this batch, the orders in the original have already been issued, and in others, the adjudication is pending and the orders have yet to be issued. 3. According, we transcribe below a C....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....d. Vs. Union of India Writ Petition No. 3383 of 2025 disposed of on 10 November 2025, we disposed of the Petition by granting the Petitioner therein liberty to appeal the order in the original by raising all permissible contentions, including the contention of delayed adjudication. The Appellate Authority was directed to dispose of the Appeal in accordance with law, no doubt, after taking cognisance of the Hon'ble Supreme Court's order dated 02 May 2025 in the case of Union of India & ors. Vs. GMR Airport Infrastructure Ltd Petition for Special Leave to Appeal (C) No. 5392 of 2025. By the said order, the Courts have been required to defer the consideration of the issue of delayed adjudication until the said Special Leave Petition is dispose....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....se Petitions by granting the Petitioners therein liberty to apply to the adjudicating authority for deferment of the adjudication proceedings. Such applications should be considered in the light of the Hon'ble Supreme Court's order of 02 May 2025, and appropriate decisions should be taken thereon. 10. We have adopted the aforesaid course of action in these matters, firstly to maintain consistency and secondly because in matters where order in original has been passed, delayed adjudication may not be the only ground on which such orders are being challenged. Should the ground of delayed adjudication fail, naturally, the Petitioners would want to challenge the orders in the original on their merits by raising all other and permissible grou....