2025 (12) TMI 315

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....dhi, Ms. Vinita A. Nara, Mr. Kshitij Kasi. For the Respondents: Mr. Jitendra B. Mishra, a/w Mr. Rupesh Dubey, Mr. Ashutosh Mishra i/by Ms. Sangeeta Yadav (V.C),. ORAL ORDER:- (PER M.S. SONAK J):- 1. Heard Mr Shah, learned Senior Advocate for the petitioner and M. Mishra, learned counsel for the respondent. 2. Rule. The Rule is made returnable immediately at the request of and with t....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

...., and King Enterprises Vs. Union of India & Ors Writ Petition No. 5094 of 2025 decided on 18 November 2025. 5. Mr. Shah states that the impugned order, even insofar as the ITC to the extent of Rs. 7,97,87,159/- warrants interference because the petitioner had furnished details of the supplier and the documents relating to the supply. He submits that the impugned order is based on vague grounds ....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

.... hesitation in quashing the impugned order to the extent that it purports to negatively block ITC to the extent of Rs. 5,95,41,069/-. The impugned order is quashed to the said extent. 9. Insofar as the challenge to the remaining portion of the impugned order is concerned, we permit the petitioner to file a detailed representation along with all particulars to the Additional Director General, DG....