2006 (3) TMI 185
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....or the respondents, may be kept on the record. We have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner at great length. 2. An appeal was pending before CESTAT which was dismissed by a reasoned order dated 16-9-2005. The petitioner applied for setting aside that order and restoration and re-hearing of that appeal. This prayer has been refused by the impugned order dated 2-2-2006. 3. The Tribunal....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ons. 6. However, we required the learned counsel for the petitioner to point out to us any substantial error in the judgment of the Tribunal dated 16-9-2005. It may be mentioned here that the judgment proceed on the basis that during an inspection of the factory of the petitioner loose papers showing clearance of goods were recovered from the pocket of the factory manager and the cashier. Durin....
TaxTMI