2025 (11) TMI 1303

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....notice u/s. 143(2) on 24.09.2018 & 27.09.2018 without complying to the CBDT Instruction F. No. 225/157/2017/ITA-II dated 23.06.2017 and so the notice issued u/s. 143(2) is not valid as per Provision of Act. 3. For that the appellant reserves the right to adduce any further ground or grounds, if necessary, at or before the hearing of the appeal. 03. After hearing the rival contentions and perusing the material on record, we find that the assessee has raised an additional ground of appeal challenging the jurisdiction of the AO to make addition. In our opinion the issued raised in the additional ground is a purely a legal issue qua which all the facts are available in the appeal folder and no further verification of facts are required from any quarter whatsoever. In our considered view the assessee is at liberty to raise any legal issue before any appellate authority for the first time even when the same has not been raised before the lower authorities. The case of the assessee is squarely covered by the decisions of the Apex court in the case of i) Jute Corporation of India Ltd. Vs CIT in 187 ITR 688, ii) National Thermal Power Co. Ltd v. CIT [1998] 229 ITR 383 and also b....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....Co. Ltd v. CIT (supra) and also by the decision of Hon'ble Calcutta High Court in PCIT vs. Britannia Industries Ltd. (supra). Therefore, we are inclined to admit the same for adjudication. 07. The ld. AR vehemently submitted that the notice u/s 143(2) of the Act dated 24.09.2018, does not specify whether it is a limited scrutiny or a complete scrutiny or a compulsory manual scrutiny. The ld. AR submitted that the CBDT has issued specific instruction vide instruction no. F. No. 225/157/2017/ITA-II Dated 23-06-2017, that the notice u/s 143(2) can be issued in one of the three format which specifically mentioned and prescribed but the present notice issued is not in accordance with such said instruction and therefore, the assessment framed consequently is invalid and void ab initio. The ld. AR in defense of his argument relied on the decision of Tapas Kumar Das Vs. ITO in ITA No. 1660/KOL/2024 vide order dated 11.03.2025 for A.Y. 2017-18, wherein similar issue has been decided in favour of the assessee. The ld. AR therefore prayed that the additional ground raised by the assessee may kindly be allowed. 08. The ld. DR on the other hand submitted that this is a computer- gener....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....#2325;िया जाता है कि निर्धारण वर्ष 2017-18 के पावती संख्या 269322761301017 के अनुसार आपके द्वारा दिनांक 30/10/2017 को दाखिल की गई आयकर विवरणी को संवीक्षा के लिए चुना गया है। This is for your kind information that the return of income filed by you for assessment year 2017-18 vide ack, no. 269322761301017 on 30/10/2017 has been selected for Scrutiny. 2. इस संबंध में, आपको दिनीक 16/11/2018 को 01:00 PM तक &#2....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....51;बाही' पर एक संक्षिप्त नोट आपके संदर्भ के लिए संलग्न है। 3. The evidence/information specified above has to be furnished online electronically through your E-filing account in incometaxindiaefiling.gov.in. Subsequent assessment proceedings shall also be conducted electronically through the 'E-Proceeding' facility of Income-tax Department. A brief note on 'E-Proceeding' is enclosed for your kind reference. 4. निर्धारण कार्यवाही के दौरान, यदि आवश्यक होगा तो सूचना / दस्तावेज हेतु विशेष प्रश्न....

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

Full Text of the Document

X X   X X   Extracts   X X   X X

....ion F.No.225/157/2017/ITA-II dated 23.06.2017. We have examined the notice, copy of which is available at page no.1 of the Paper Book and find that the same is not as per the format of CBDT Instruction F.No. 225/157/2017/ITA-II dated 23.06.2017 as stated above. In our opinion, the instruction issued by the CBDT are mandatory and binding on the Income tax authorities failing which the proceedings would be rendered as invalid. Hon'ble Apex Court in case of UCO Bank (supra) held that the circular issued by CBDT in exercise of its statutory powers u/s 119 of the Act, are binding on the authorities. The Hon'ble Apex court held as under :- "The Central Board of Direct Taxes under section 119 of the Income-tax Act, 1961, has power, inter alia, to tone down the rigour of the law and ensure a fair enforcement of its provisions, by issuing circulars in exercise of its statutory powers under section 119 of the Act which are binding on the authorities in the administration of the Act. Under section 119(2)(a), however, the circulars as contemplated therein cannot be adverse to the assessee. The power is given for the purpose of just, proper and efficient management of the work ....