2025 (11) TMI 849
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....etitioner(s) Mr. Navin Pahwa, Sr. Adv., Mr. S.S. Sobti, Adv., Mr. Mohit D. Ram, Adv., Ms. Sthavi Asthana, AOR For the Respondent(s) Mr. Anand Dilip Landge, Adv., Mr. Siddharth Dharmadhikari, Adv., Mr. Aaditya Aniruddha Pande, AOR, Mr. Shrirang B. Varma, Adv., Mr. Ashwani Kumar, AOR, Ms. Iti Sharma, Adv., Mr. Puneet Sharma, Adv. ORDER PER 1. Leave granted. 2. The appellant was convicted....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....e appellant as well as the learned counsel appearing for the respondents. It is submitted by the learned Senior counsel appearing for the appellant that the Court had invoked Article 142 of the Constitution of India in the aforesaid decision and therefore, the same cannot be treated as a law. 5. Construing it to be a law would discourage settlements at the revisional stage. The appellant is not....
TaxTMI