2025 (11) TMI 677
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....Petitioner: Mr Vipul J Shah, with Ms Siddhi Mathe,. For the Respondents: Mr Y R Mishra, with Ms Niyati Mankad (through VC), Ms Bhavana Ahire, & Ms Pratishtha Shukla,. ORAL ORDER:- (PER M. S. SONAK, J) 1. Heard Mr Vipul Shah for the Petitioner and Mr Y R Mishra for the Respondents. 2. Rule. The Rule is made returnable immediately at the request of and with the consent of the l....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ember 2024, was called upon to attend the personal hearing on 20 December 2024, to be held online. Therefore, the Petitioner, by its mail dated 16 December 2024 (Exhibit D6 at page 84 of the paper book), wrote to the First Appellate Authority that its representative would like to attend the personal hearing scheduled for 20 December 2024 in person, instead of online. 7. The records further show....
X X X X Extracts X X X X
X X X X Extracts X X X X
....ities were provided to the Petitioner but that it was the Petitioner who failed to utilise them is not supported by the record. For the personal hearing scheduled online on 20 December 2024, the Petitioner's representative offered to attend in person. A request to this effect was made well in advance. The Petitioner was not informed that such a request had been rejected. Instead, the Petitioner wa....
TaxTMI